So, the Super Bowl was yesterday, and while I am still annoyed that Stephen Colbert stole my Facebook joke from a year ago (Colbert, I would gladly accept a writing job) I am super excited that my team won.
As many of you know - Sodastream was all over the news these past few weeks with stories about their Ad having been banned and breaking ties with Scarlett Johannson. With roughly 12 tweets an hour, I unfollowed Sodastream yesterday on Twitter for spamming my feed with unfunny and non-relevant content.
So, there is a lesson to be learned here - not only was Sodastream's investment in the Super Bowl unnecessary, but it was foolish. Early in the week, Sodastream took over the national news with a "Banned Ad" here is the thing - this was intentionally banned. Sodastream gave the news a story, and they bought it. Last year's SS ad was banned for THE SAME REASON - product shaming its competitors (Coke/Pepsi - who the Super Bowl Commission has reason to not allow shaming of, namely $$$$). The ad that was aired implied that it was "too Sexy" for television. Their ad was featured and played on HUNDREDS of news sites and on the air - for FREE. So why pay to air an ad during the SB - other than more traffic?
Okay, let me just climb up on my high horse here - a couple of things. Soda is no longer a lifestyle drink, and if it was - I am just not sure sex is the brand SS should be selling. Focusing on ethical consumption, green, money saving has worked well for SS in the past - gaining them significant ground and market penetration. So, ScarJo and sex is a huge brand narrative departure. Also, I DETEST when creating content specifically to fool America into sharing works. Social Media should be about genuine dialogue and engagement. The news and other channels broadcasting this doesn't equate virality - well, technically it does, just not in a consumer to consumer sense, which should always be the goal rather than B2C and Media2C. ALSO, breaking with your branding, and inserting yourself into a discussion on everything (like the above) alienates your advocates.
Social Media Marketing is about a couple of things that are longer term plays - loyalty and brand identity. You can't get that with shallow engagement and breaks from your value proposition.Yes, Sodastream won a TON of traffic, and they may even get sales- but its unlikely they will see longer term growth with this strategy.
Further - be cautious with your Twitter - its tempting to be tweeting about every cultural event, but in the end - Sodastream tweeting about James Franco feels strange. Brands need to develop a voice and a narrative that they can use on Twitter. I would have been more interested in a tweet about the "Coke side of life" and how much waste it creates (focusing again on value proposition). Pop culture commentary (no matter how fun) is not necessarily the vertical brands belong in - even on Twitter. Oreo hit it out of the park by integrating their brand proposition into their social media strategy last year AND tying it with a pop culture event. Remember your audience, remember who your brand is- and ALWAYS keep your strategy centered on those two things. Authenticity and consistency matter and focusing on that will garner long term results.
Monday, February 3, 2014
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
P-interest-ing
Pinterest "explore" is new, and its awesome.
Its mostly an amalgam of search terms and tags - but its an stellar way to help surface visual search. I look forward to seeing it evolve.
Its mostly an amalgam of search terms and tags - but its an stellar way to help surface visual search. I look forward to seeing it evolve.
Side note - the above is my "explore" page. I am totally on board with almost everything there - but I have no idea how Julianna Margulies ended up on this list. I guess maybe I should listen to my friends and finally watch The Good Wife.
Monday, January 20, 2014
HI There Buzzfeed Employee
Hi there Buzzfeed Employee,

Nothing personal, but I hate you.
Seriously. I mean as a marketer, I get how talented you are at pandering to the public. I imagine your discussions go like this:
You: "how about a list of childhood shows from every demographic ever on the internet"
Everyone else: YES!!!
Look, I get that you are creating "moments" and helping people relate to each other - and it works; Its just that your work exactly illustrates what I hate about the internet. Rather than actually relating, we share ready made nonsense en masse. I don't need a third party to tell me what matters. My nostalgia is not for sale.
And yes, since you are probably thinking it - I AM actually resentful of your success. I RESENT how easily you are able to commoditize pop culture and my history and think what you are doing is hacky.
But since you will anyway, keep up the "good" work.
Sincerely,
Rachel

Nothing personal, but I hate you.
Seriously. I mean as a marketer, I get how talented you are at pandering to the public. I imagine your discussions go like this:
You: "how about a list of childhood shows from every demographic ever on the internet"
Everyone else: YES!!!
Look, I get that you are creating "moments" and helping people relate to each other - and it works; Its just that your work exactly illustrates what I hate about the internet. Rather than actually relating, we share ready made nonsense en masse. I don't need a third party to tell me what matters. My nostalgia is not for sale.
And yes, since you are probably thinking it - I AM actually resentful of your success. I RESENT how easily you are able to commoditize pop culture and my history and think what you are doing is hacky.
But since you will anyway, keep up the "good" work.
Sincerely,
Rachel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)